Completing the Axiom list.

[skeloric]

I've been at loggerheads with others over the Axioms for ages.
There is a prevalent opinion that the current Axioms cannot be completely filled in without massive distortion of the known elements of the list and thus -- at last point -- there was talk of building the Axioms from the ground up with no regard for the current charts at all.

I could be wrong -- after all it does seem be a World Law of our own reality that I am to be assumed to be wrong 99% of the time -- but I have had a long term goal of filling in the Axioms without causing massive alterations.

I do have a beginnings of sorts:
The Tech Axiom 24 to 33 (http://www.freewebs.com/skeloric-torg/SKEL-Tech24to33.pdf)
So I have gotten some work completed.

Unfortunately, I grew a bit discouraged on the project and keep meaning to start again.

[skeloric]

Note, this is an older incarnation of the span from 24 to 33.
One error is still in this copy:
Tech 30 where it mentions "no more spectacular than driving across town" instead it should read " no more spectacular than driving to a nearby city".

[slink]

Concerning your notes: in 1.5 there are entries for Tech 28 and 29.
If Eric doesn't mind I can post the axiom charts somewhere (or extracts if posting the complete charts is not acceptable).

[skeloric]

Concerning your notes: in 1.5 there are entries for Tech 28 and 29.
If Eric doesn't mind I can post the axiom charts somewhere (or extracts if posting the complete charts is not acceptable).

I'm not worried about 1.5 yet.
I'm still trying to see if I can do 1.0 and if I ever finish THEN I'll worry about reconciling with 1.5.

[slink]

It is my hope to build MY version of the Axioms someday for use in
TORG1.0
Not having access to "1.5", I haven't a clue as to how much of the
Axioms have already been built up and thus I could be pointlessly
trying to reinvent the wheel...
I was just referring to that fact as you do try to reinvent something that's already been done.

[skeloric]

I was just referring to that fact as you do try to reinvent something that's already been done.
Am I close in my reinvent?

[slink]

As was to be expected, sometimes yes, sometimes no. I'd rather leave that to Jim to comment as he designed or at least compiled the chart. Maybe I still can post it (once Eric reads this :) )